World Scientific News
EISSN 2392-2192
  • Login
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Guide for Authors
    • Abstracting & Indexing
    • Instruction for Authors
    • Submit your Article
  • View Articles
    • 2026
    • 2025
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
  • Careers
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SUBMIT ARTICLE
Register
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Guide for Authors
    • Abstracting & Indexing
    • Instruction for Authors
    • Submit your Article
  • View Articles
    • 2026
    • 2025
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
  • Careers
  • News
No Result
View All Result
World Scientific News
No Result
View All Result
Home 2024

Assessment of risk factors in condominium buildings construction in metro manila using analythic hierarchy process (AHP)

Authors: Abdulwahid D. Dirampaten and Albert A. Grińo, Jr, WSN 195 (2024) 189-209

2024-07-29
Reading Time: 13 mins read
0

ABSTRACT

The rapid urbanization of Metro Manila led to a surge in condominium construction projects, which, despite offering efficient housing solutions, faced significant challenges due to dense urban environment, susceptibility to natural disasters & the health and safety issues related to accidents, losses, injuries, damages, and/or delays arising during the execution of a project which may adversely affect its success. This study explored the efficacy of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in assessing and prioritizing risks specific to Metro Manila’s condominium construction projects, addressing a critical gap in current risk assessment methodologies. The study engaged a combined methodology, integrating Meta-Analysis, Experts Consultation, and AHP, to identify and prioritize Risk Factors (RFs) in condominium construction projects. An extensive literature review through Meta-Analysis identified nine critical RFs, spanning Technical/Design, Financial/Economic, Environmental, Regulatory/Legal, Socio-Political, Logistics/Supply Chain, Management/Supervision, Quality, and Health and Safety Risks. Expert input from a diverse group of professionals, each with over 10 years of experience and holding master’s degrees, validated and refined these findings. AHP analysis established the priority ranking, with Health and Safety Risk as the foremost concern (19.52% criteria weight), followed by Quality Risk (15.97%) and Management/Supervision Risk (15.77%). The consistency ratio of 0.71% attested to the reliability of expert judgments. The study addressed the critical need for a comprehensive understanding of RFs in condominium construction, given the inherent complexity of such projects. Identifying and prioritizing RFs was vital for enhancing project resilience, ensuring successful outcomes, and advancing the construction industry. This approach bridged the gap between theoretical risk assessment and practical implementation, offering actionable insights for stakeholders, project managers, and decision-makers in the construction industry.

References

[1] Aven, T. (2015). Risk Analysis. Norway: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[2] Smith, N. J., Merna, T., & Jobling, P. (2014). Managing Risk in Construction Projects. West Sussex, UK: John wiley & sons, Ltd.

[3] Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2012). Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Springer Science & Business Media.

[4] Nikolopoulou, K. (2022, August 11). What Is Purposive Sampling? | Definition & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved November 28, 2023, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/purposive-sampling?

ADVERTISEMENT

[5] Phoya, S. (2012). Health and safety risk management on building construction sites in Tanzania: The practice of risk assessment, communication and control (Licentiate thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Architecture, Gothenburg, Sweden)

[6] Reyes, A. (2020). Chapter 8: fdi in the Philippines and the Pitfalls of Economic Nationalism. In International Investment Treaties and Arbitration Across Asia (pp. 243-279). Manila: BRILL.

[7] Adnan, T., Maleque, M. S. E., Jamal, M. S., & Sobuz, M. H. R. (2020, February). Factors affecting delay and safety on construction projects in Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Civil Engineering for Sustainable Development (ICCESD 2020) (pp. 7-9).

[8] Ahmad, O., & Nouban, F. (2023). Economic and Time Risk Factors Influencing the Construction Projects: A Case Study of Lebanese Construction Projects. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(3), 399-407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14525/JJCE.v17i3.03

[9][Akinola, V. O. (2023). Evaluating the Impact of Risk Factors on Construction Projects of Foci in Nigeria. Journal of Civil and Environmental Studies, 10(2), 68-78. 9] https://doi.org/10.36108/laujoces/3202.01.0270

[10] Alamdari, A., Jabarzadeh, Y., & Samson, D. (2021). Supply chain risk factors in green construction of residential mega projects – interactions and categorization. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(2), 568-597. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2021-0663

[11] Alattyih, W., Haider, H., & Alsohiman, N. (2022). Value Creation Assessment Tool for Green Buildings: Development and Implementation. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2022, 1-23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9855548

[12] Al-Bahar, J., & Crandall, K. (1990). SYSTEMATIC RISK MANAGEMENT APPROACH FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 116(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:3(533)

[13] Al-Bayati, A. J. (2021). Impact of construction safety culture and construction safety climate on safety behavior and safety motivation. Safety, 7(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety7020041

[14] Al-Sabbah, R., Menassa, C., & Awad, H. (2014). Evaluating impact of construction risks in the Arabian Gulf Region from perspective of multinational architecture, engineering and construction firms. Construction Management and Economics, 32(4), 382-402. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2014.884281

[15] Altubaishe, B., & Desai, S. (2023). Multicriteria Decision Making in Supply Chain Management Using FMEA and Hybrid AHP-PROMETHEE Algorithms. Sensors, 43(4041). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/s23084041

[16] Ammar, T., Abdel-Monem, M., & El-Dash, K. (2022). Risk factors causing cost overruns in road networks. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101720

[17] Amora, V., & Juanzon, J. (2022). A Framework of critical risk factors and Success Criteria for Structural Works of a Mixed-Use Building Construction Project. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(1), 267-279. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2022.100123

[18] Amusat, A. S., Oyedokun, M. O., Omisope, E. T., & Egbetokun, O. A. (2023). Risk Management in Agricultural Business: Insurance as a Viable Option in Nigeria. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 45(8), 49-53. https://doi.org/10.9734/JEAI/2023/v45i82154

[19] Andal, E. R., & Juanzon, J. P. (2020). Identifying Risks in Implementing Sustainable Building Materials in Condominium Fit-out Projects Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 8(6), 1266-1276. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2020.080610

[20] Božanić, D., Tešić, D., Komazec, N., Marinković, D., & Puška , A. (2023). Interval fuzzy AHP method in risk assessment. Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 4(1), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.31181/rme040122082023b

[21] Carrasco, S., & Egbelakin, T. (2022). Unravelling the challenges for long-term planning post-disaster resettlement in Cagayan de Oro, Philippines. Earth and Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1101/2/022038

[22] Chandra, H. P. (2015). Structural equation model for investigating risk factors affecting project success in Surabaya. The 5th International Conference of Euro Asia Civil Engineering Forum (EACEF-5) (pp. 53-59). Surabaya: Procedia Engineering. Retrieved from http://creativecommons.org/license/by-nc-nd/4.0/

[23] Chen, H., Li, H., Wang, Y., & Cheng, b. (2020). A Comprehensive Assessment Approach for Water-Soil Environmental Risk during Railway Construction in Ecological Fragile Region Based on AHP and MEA. Sustainability, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197910

[24] Coskun, C., Dikmen, I., & Birgonul, M. (2023). Sustainability risk assessment in mega construction projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 13(5), 700-718. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-10-2022-0153

[25] Darko, A., Chan, A., Ameyaw, E., Owusu, E., Parn, E., & Edwards, D. (2018). Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction. International Journal of Construction Management, 436-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1452098

[26] Dina, M., & Purba, A. (2022). Occupational health and safety risk analysis in construction projects: A systematic literature review. Indonesian Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management (IJIEM), 3(1), 35-46.

[27] Dziadosz, A., & Rejment, M. (2015). Risk analysis in construction project – chosen methods. Operational Research in Sustainable Development and Civil Engineering – meeting of EURO (pp. 258-265). Poland: Procedia Engineering. Retrieved from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

[28] Edwards, P. J., & Bowen, P. A. (1998). Risk and risk management in construction: a review and future directions for research. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 339-349.

[29] Eleabasil, A. C., Dim, N., Ezeabasili, C., & Obiefuna, J. (2021). The Identificationof Risksand its Criticalityin the Nigeria Construction Industry. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research.

[30] El-Sayegh, S. M. (2008). Risk assessment and allocation in the UAE construction industry. International Journal of Project Managemen, 26, 431-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.07.004

[31] Evrin, V. (2021, April 28). Risk Assessment and Analysis Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative. Los Angeles, California, USA.

[32] Fei, X., & Khan, T. (2015). Identifying attributes for expert construction project managers in the context of China. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 5(7), 407-418. https://doi.org/https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/ijoass/2015

[33] Gamal, Y., Mohamed Abd Allah, E., Maged, M., & Enieb, M. (2022). Assessment of risk factors causing delays in road construction in Egypt. 36th Eg-MRS International Conference. Cairo, Egypt: IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1269/1/012007

[34] Gilbert, A., Savacool, B., Johnstone, P., & Stirling, A. (2017). Cost overruns and financial risk in the construction of nuclear power reactors: A critical appraisal. Energy Policy, 644-649.

[35] Guo, X., & Kapucu, N. (2019). Examining Stakeholder Participation in Social Stability Risk Assessment for Mega Projects using Network Analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 1-31.

[36] HO, W. (2008). Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications – A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(1), 211-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004

[37] Joble, J. C., & Briones, J. P. (2022). Safety Risk and its Impact to the Risk Management System in the Construction Industry at National Capital Region Philippines. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies, 148-156.

[38] Kabirifar, K.; Mojtahedi, M. The impact of Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) Phases on Project Performance: A Case of Large-scale Residential Construction Project. Buildings 2019, 9, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9010015

[39] Kangari, R. (1988). Construction risk management. Civil Engineering Systems, 114-120.

[40] Kangari, R., & Riggs, L. (1989). Construction Risk Assessment by Linguistics. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT.

[41] Karakhan, A., Xu, Y., Nnaji, C., & Alsaffar, O. (2018). Technology Alternatives for Workplace Safety Risk mitigating in Construction: Exploratory Study. Advances in Informatics and Computing in Civil and Construction Engineering, 823-829.

[42] Kim, M.-S., Lee, E.-B., Jung, I.-H., & Alleman, D. (2018). Risk Assessment and mitigating Model for Overseas Steel-Plant Project Investment with Analytic Hierarchy Process—Fuzzy Inference System. Sustainability.

[43] Kleibert, J., & Kippers, L. (2016). Living the good life? The rise of urban mixed-use enclaves in Metro Manila. Urban Geography, 373-395.

[44] Koretskyi, Y. (2020). Mechanisms of state regulation of environmental safety in emergency situations. Public administration and local government.

[45] Lee, S. (2014). Determination of Priority Weights under Multiattribute Decision-Making Situations: AHP versus Fuzzy AHP. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000897

[46] Lendra, L., Pandohop Gawei, A., Sintani, L., Afanda, D., & Tjakra, J. (2023). The Assessment of Occupational Safety and Health Risk Management on Construction Projects [47] During the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Disaster Management.

[47] Li, J., Wang, Y., Wang, G., Yao, X., & Wang, T. (2023). Construction and empirical testing of comprehensive risk evaluation methods from a multi-dimensional risk matrix perspective: taking specific types of natural disasters risk in China as an example. Navigation: Science adn Technology, 1245-1271.

[48] Liu, J., Du, Z., Ma, L., & Liu, C. (2021). Identification and Assessment of Subway Construction Risk: An Integration of AHP and Experts Grading Method. Advances in Civil Engineering.

[49] Lloyd, S., Gray, J., Healey, S., & Opdyke, A. (2022). Social vulnerability to natural hazards in the Philippines. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[50] Masood, R. & Choudhry, R. M. (2010), Identification of Risk Factors for Construction Contracting Firms – Encompassing Mitigation Stance. Second International Conference on Construction in Developing Countries (ICCIDC-II), 251-260.

[51] Mistry, H., & Lombardi, D. (2023). A stochastic exposure model for seismic risk assessment and pricing of catastrophe bonds. Natural Hazards, 803-829.

[52] Montellano, D., Masangkay Jr., B., & Calanoga, I. (2019). UNIT RESIDENTS’ SATISFACTION LEVEL ON THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT AND INTERACTIONAL QUALITY OF A CONDOMINIUM IN A UNIVERSITY BELT IN MANILA, PHILIPPINES. 3rd Asian Conference on Institutional and Action Research (ACIAR 2019). Cagayan de Oro City.

[53] Mussa, R. K., Yeom, C., & Lee, S. (2023). Analysis of risk factors associated with railway projects in Tanzania. The Open Transportation Journal, 17.

[54] Neyestani, B., & Juanzon, J. P. (2017). Effects of ISO 9001 Standard on Critical Factors of Project Management in Construction Industry. 2017 Manila International Conference on “Trends in Engineering and Technology”. Manila: URUAE.

[55] Nguyen, T., Nguyen, L., Chilesche, N., & Hallo, L. (2022). Investigating critical risk factors of selecting joint venture contractors for infrastructure projects implementation in Vietnam. International Journal of Construction Management , 2438-2451.

[56] Ortega, A. A. (2016). Manila’s metropolitan landscape of gentrification: Global urban development, accumulation by dispossession & neoliberal warfare against informality. Geoforum, 35-50.

[57] Perry, J. G., & Hayes, R. W. (1985). Risk and its management in construction projects. Proc. Instn. Civ. Engrs. , 499-521.

[58] Petrenko, H., Hrynenko, I., Nikolaiev, G., Petrukha, N., Ryzhakova, H., & Rogach, K. (2022). DEFINITION OF SYSTEM-WIDE DETERMINANTS OF THE DYNAMIC DEVELOPMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES IN THE CONCEPTS OF COMPLIANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT. Management of Development of Complex Systems.

[59] Ray, M., Tornello, A., Pickart, F., Stripling, M., Ali, M., & Vargas, L. (2023). A jurisdictional risk assessment for the whole community: A new, systematic approach to participatory decision-making in public health emergency preparedness using the analytic hierarchy process. Wiley.

[60] Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

[61] Santos, J. R., Tapia, J. D., Lamberte, A., Solis, C., Tan, R. R., Aviso, K. B., & Yu, K. (2022). Uncertainty Analysis of Business Interruption Losses in the Philippines Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Economies.

[62] Sharaf, M. M. M., & Abdelwahab, H. T. (2015). Analysis of risk factors for highway construction projects in Egypt. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(5), 526-533. https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2015.05.004

[63] Shin, D.-W., Shin, Y., & KIm, G.-H. (2016). Comparison of Risk Assessment for a Nuclear Power Plant Construction Project Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Building Construction and Planning Research, 157-171.

[64] Siraj, N., & Fayek, A. (2019). Risk Identification and Common Risks in Construction: Literature Review and Content Analysis. ASCE-Journal of Engineering Management.

[65] Suárez Sánchez, F. A., Carvajal Peláez, G. I., & Catalá Alís, J. (2017). Occupational safety and health in construction: A review of applications and trends. Industrial Health, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. Received 2016 Jun 10; Accepted 2017 Feb 1. Copyright ©2017 National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health.

[66] Subhav Singh, Anju Bala, Saurav Dixit and Deekshant Varshne, Critical Analysis of Causes of Delay in Residential Construction Projects in India. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(1), 2018, pp. 330-345. http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=9&IType=1

[67] Suner, A., Çelikoğlu, C., Dicle, O., & Sökmen, S. (2012). Sequential decision tree using the analytic hierarchy process for decision support in rectal cancer. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 56(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2012.05.003

[68] Sutantio, A., Anwar, N., Wiguna, I. P. A., & Suryani, E. (2022). DEVELOPING A MODEL OF SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION FOR CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; CASE OF INDONESIA . GEOMATE Journal, 23(96), 85–94. Retrieved from https://geomatejournal.com/geomate/article/view/3319

[69] Szymanski, P. (2017). Risk Management in Construction Projects. 2nd International Joint Conference on Innovative Solutions in Construction Engineering and Management (pp. 174-182). Poland: Procedia Engineering.

[70] Tao, F., Pi, Y., Deng, M., Tang, Y., & Yuan, C. (2023). Research on Intelligent Grading Evaluation of Water Conservancy Project Safety Risks Based on Deep Learning. Water.

[71] Taylan, O., Bafail, A., Abdulaal, R., & Kabli, M. (2014). Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHPand fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies. Applied Soft Computing.

[72] Tessema, A. T., Alene, G. A., & Wolelaw, N. M. (2022). Assessment of risk factors on construction projects in Gondar City, Ethiopia. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11726

[73] Tran, T., Childerhouse, P., & Deakins, E. (2016). Supply chain information sharing: challenges and risk mitigating strategies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.

[74] Ukaogo, P., Ewuzie, U., & Onwuka, C. (2020). Environmental pollution: causes, effects, and the remedies. Environmental and Health, 419-429.

[75] Wang, Q., Zhao, Z., & Wang, Z. (2023). Data-Driven Analysis of Risk-Assessment Methods for Cold Food Chains. Foods.

[76] Wang, X., Yu, X., & Yu, X. (2022). Flood Disaster Risk Assessment Based on DEA Model in Southeast Asia along “The Belt and Road”. Sustainabilty.

[77] Waqar, A., Othman, I., & González-Lezcano, R. (2023). Challenges to the Implementation of BIM for the Risk Management of Oil and Gas Construction Projects: Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Sustainabilty.

[78] William, J., KImaro, J., & Mchopa, A. (2020). Global Supply Chains Vulnerability And Distortions Amidst Covid19 Pandemic Antecedents For Building Resilience In Downstream Logistics. Moshi Co-Operative University.

[79] Wuni, I., Shen, G., & Antwi-Afari, M. (2021). Exploring the design risk factors for modular integrated construction projects. Construction Innovation.

[80] Wuni, I., Shen, G., & Saka, A. (2023). Computing the severities of critical onsite assembly risk factors for modular integrated construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.

[81] Xavier, V., Couto, R., Monteiro, R., Castro, J., & Bento, R. (2022). Detailed Structural Characterization of Existing RC Buildings for Seismic Exposure Modelling of the Lisbon Area. Buildings.

[82] Zahedi, F. (1986). The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications. Informs Journal on Applied Analytics, 16(4), 96-108. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.16.4.96

[83] Zavadskas, E., Turskis, Z., & Tamošaitiene, J. (2010). RISK ASSESSMENT OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 33-46.

[84] Zhao, Y., Qiu, R., Chen, M., & Xiao, S. (2023). Research on Operational Safety Risk Assessment Method for Long and Large Highway Tunnels Based on FAHP and SPA. Applied Science.

[85] Ziaee, S., Gholampour, Z., Soleymani, M., Doraj, P., Eskandani, O., & Kadaei, S. (2022). Optimization of Energy in Sustainable Architecture and Green Roofs in Construction: [13] A Review of Challenges and Advantages. Hindawi.

[86] Zou, P., Zhang, G., & Wang, J. (2007). Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China. International Journal of Project Management, 601-614.

[87] Pınar BAŞAR (2023). Major problems and challenges in the construction industry that need to be addressed and solved by various stakeholder. Publication Information: 2023, Journal of Aviation DOI: 10.30518/jav.1307693


Download all article in PDF

WSN 195 (2024) 189-209


 

Tags: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)CondominiumResidential BuildingRisk Factors
ShareTweetPin
Next Post

Performance Evaluation of Solubility Models for CO2 Dissolved and Trapped during Sequestration

Transforming A-stable Linear Multistep Formulas into Implicit Symmetric Runge-Kuta integration schemes for solving chaotic and stiff differential systems

View free articles

  • Open access

View Articles

  • 2013 (5)
    • Volume 1 (2013), pp. 1-14 (2)
    • Volume 2 (2013), pp. 1-29 (3)
  • 2014 (13)
    • Volume 3 (2014), pp. 1-21 (3)
    • Volume 4 (2014), pp. 1-16 (2)
    • Volume 5 (2014), pp. 1-36 (4)
    • Volume 6 (2014), pp. 1-23 (3)
  • 2015 (109)
    • Volume 10 (2015), pp. 1-100 (5)
    • Volume 11 (2015), pp. 1-96 (6)
    • Volume 12 (2015), pp. 1-76 (6)
    • Volume 13 (2015), pp. 1-130 (7)
    • Volume 14 (2015), pp. 1-55 (1)
    • Volume 15 (2015), pp. 1-25 (2)
    • Volume 16 (2015), pp. 1-158 (9)
    • Volume 17 (2015), pp. 1-63 (1)
    • Volume 18 (2015), pp. 1-127 (8)
    • Volume 19 (2015), pp. 1-111 (7)
    • Volume 20 (2015), pp. 1-336 (1)
    • Volume 21 (2015), pp. 1-89 (7)
    • Volume 22 (2015), pp. 1-119 (8)
    • Volume 23 (2015), pp. 1-127 (10)
    • Volume 24 (2015), pp. 1-87 (6)
    • Volume 7 (2015), pp. 1-237 (9)
    • Volume 8 (2015), pp. 1-203 (7)
    • Volume 9 (2015), pp. 1-160 (9)
  • 2016 (517)
    • Volume 25 (2016), pp. 1-16 (2)
    • Volume 26 (2016), pp. 1-19 (2)
    • Volume 27 (2016), pp. 1-16 (2)
    • Volume 28 (2016), pp. 1-100 (7)
    • Volume 29 (2016), pp. 1-95 (6)
    • Volume 30 (2016), pp. 1-142 (10)
    • Volume 31 (2016), pp. 1-124 (8)
    • Volume 32 (2016), pp. 1-81 (9)
    • Volume 33 (2016), pp. 1-121 (8)
    • Volume 34 (2016), pp. 1-145 (10)
    • Volume 35 (2016), pp. 1-133 (10)
    • Volume 36 (2016), pp. 1-152 (10)
    • Volume 37 (2016), pp. 1-303 (18)
    • Volume 38 (2016), pp. 1-59 (1)
    • Volume 39 (2016), pp. 1-30 (2)
    • Volume 40 (2016), pp. 1-299 (20)
    • Volume 41 (2016), pp. 1-287 (36)
    • Volume 42 (2016), pp. 1-316 (21)
    • Volume 43(1,2,3) (2016), pp. 1-157 (3)
      • Volume 43, Issue 1 (2016), pp. 1-55 (1)
      • Volume 43, Issue 2 (2016), pp. 56-103 (1)
      • Volume 43, Issue 3 (2016), pp. 104-157 (1)
    • Volume 44 (2016), pp. 1-301 (20)
    • Volume 45(1,2) (2016), pp. 1-383 (21)
      • Volume 45, Issue 1 (2016), pp. 1-62 (1)
      • Volume 45, Issue 2 (2016), pp. 63-383 (20)
    • Volume 46 (2016), pp. 1-286 (20)
    • Volume 47(1,2) (2016), pp. 1-350 (21)
      • Volume 47, Issue 1 (2016), pp. 1-61 (1)
      • Volume 47, Issue 2 (2016), pp. 62-350 (20)
    • Volume 48 (2016), pp. 1-163 (17)
    • Volume 49(1,2) (2016), pp. 1-404 (21)
      • Volume 49, Issue 1 (2016), pp. 1-58 (1)
      • Volume 49, Issue 2 (2016), pp. 59-404 (20)
    • Volume 50 (2016), pp. 1-316 (20)
    • Volume 51 (2016), pp. 1-71 (7)
    • Volume 52 (2016), pp. 1-275 (20)
    • Volume 53(1,2,3) (2016), pp. 1-429 (22)
      • Volume 53, Issue 1 (2016), pp. 1-66 (1)
      • Volume 53, Issue 2 (2016), pp. 67-109 (1)
      • Volume 53, Issue 3 (2016), pp. 110-429 (20)
    • Volume 54 (2016), pp. 1-299 (20)
    • Volume 55 (2016), pp. 1-288 (20)
    • Volume 56 (2015), pp. 1-266 (20)
    • Volume 57 (2016), pp. 1-570 (53)
    • Volume 58 (2016), pp. 1-161 (10)
    • Volume 59 (2016), pp. 1-128 (10)
    • Volume 60 (2016), pp. 1-120 (10)
  • 2017 (481)
    • Volume 61(1,2) (2017), pp. 1-194 (11)
      • Volume 61, Issue 1 (2017), pp. 1-51 (1)
      • Volume 61, Issue 2 (2017), pp. 52-194 (10)
    • Volume 62 (2017), pp. 1-146 (10)
    • Volume 63 (2017), pp. 1-240 (1)
    • Volume 64 (2017), pp. 1-140 (10)
    • Volume 65 (2017), pp. 1-175 (10)
    • Volume 66 (2017), pp. 1-300 (20)
    • Volume 67(1,2,) (2017), pp. 1-389 (21)
      • Volume 67, Issue 1 (2017), pp. 1-67 (1)
      • Volume 67, Issue 2 (2017), pp. 68-389 (20)
    • Volume 68 (2017), pp. 1-141 (1)
    • Volume 69 (2017), pp. 1-253 (20)
    • Volume 70(1,2) (2017), pp. 1-321 (21)
      • Volume 70, Issue 1 (2017), pp. 1-50 (1)
      • Volume 70, Issue 2 (2017), pp. 51-321 (20)
    • Volume 71 (2017), pp. 1-219 (18)
    • Volume 72 (2017), pp. 1-478 (46)
    • Volume 73 (2017), pp. 1-133 (15)
    • Volume 74 (2017), pp. 1-287 (20)
    • Volume 75 (2017), pp. 1-111 (12)
    • Volume 76 (2017), pp. 1-199 (20)
    • Volume 77(1,2) (2017), pp. 1-380 (21)
      • Volume 77, Issue 1 (2017), pp. 1-102 (1)
      • Volume 77, Issue 2 (2017), pp. 103-380 (20)
    • Volume 78 (2017), pp. 1-230 (24)
    • Volume 79 (2017), pp. 1-89 (1)
    • Volume 80 (2017), pp. 1-323 (20)
    • Volume 81(1,2) (2017), pp. 1-312 (21)
      • Volume 81, Issue 1 (2017), pp. 1-47 (1)
      • Volume 81, Issue 2 (2017), pp. 48-312 (20)
    • Volume 82 (2017), pp. 1-90 (1)
    • Volume 83 (2017), pp. 1-239 (20)
    • Volume 84 (2017), pp. 1-92 (1)
    • Volume 85 (2017), pp. 1-73 (10)
    • Volume 86(1,2,3) (2017), pp. 1-370 (22)
      • Volume 86, Issue 1 (2017), pp. 1-58 (1)
      • Volume 86, Issue 2 (2017), pp. 59-122 (1)
      • Volume 86, Issue 3 (2017), pp. 123-370 (20)
    • Volume 87 (2017), pp. 1-255 (20)
    • Volume 88(1,2) (2017), pp. 1-226 (11)
      • Volume 88, Issue 1 (2017), pp. 1-57 (1)
      • Volume 88, Issue 2 (2017), pp. 58-226 (10)
    • Volume 89 (2017), pp. 1-321 (33)
    • Volume 90 (2017), pp. 1-270 (20)
  • 2018 (486)
    • Volume 100 (2018), pp. 1-253 (20)
    • Volume 101 (2018), pp. 1-252 (20)
    • Volume 102 (2018), pp. 1-223 (20)
    • Volume 103 (2018), pp. 1-249 (18)
    • Volume 104 (2018), pp. 1-492 (40)
    • Volume 105 (2018), pp. 1-232 (20)
    • Volume 106 (2018), pp. 1-244 (20)
    • Volume 107 (2018), pp. 1-232 (20)
    • Volume 108 (2018), pp. 1-244 (20)
    • Volume 109 (2018), pp. 1-266 (19)
    • Volume 110 (2018), pp. 1-243 (20)
    • Volume 111 (2018), pp. 1-181 (17)
    • Volume 112 (2018), pp. 1-251 (20)
    • Volume 113 (2018), pp. 1-250 (26)
    • Volume 114 (2018), pp. 1-264 (20)
    • Volume 91 (2018), pp. 1-137 (10)
    • Volume 92(1,2) (2018), pp. 1-399 (21)
      • Volume 92, Issue 1 (2018), pp. 1-138 (1)
      • Volume 92, Issue 2 (2018), pp. 139-399 (20)
    • Volume 93 (2018), pp. 1-141 (15)
    • Volume 94(1,2) (2018), pp. 1-332 (21)
      • Volume 94, Issue 1 (2018), pp. 1-71 (1)
      • Volume 94, Issue 2 (2018), pp. 72-332 (20)
    • Volume 95 (2018), pp. 1-272 (20)
    • Volume 96 (2018), pp. 1-250 (20)
    • Volume 97 (2018), pp. 1-284 (20)
    • Volume 98 (2018), pp. 1-232 (20)
    • Volume 99 (2018), pp. 1-229 (19)
  • 2019 (467)
    • Volume 115 (2019), pp. 1-268 (20)
    • Volume 116 (2019), pp. 1-252 (19)
    • Volume 117 (2019), pp. 1-242 (20)
    • Volume 118 (2019), pp. 1-280 (20)
    • Volume 119 (2019), pp. 1-253 (20)
    • Volume 120(1,2) (2019), pp. 1-295 (21)
      • Volume 120, Issue 1 (2019), pp. 1-59 (1)
      • Volume 120, Issue 2 (2019), pp. 60-295 (20)
    • Volume 121 (2019), pp. 1-100 (13)
    • Volume 122 (2019), pp. 1-262 (20)
    • Volume 123 (2019), pp. 1-273 (20)
    • Volume 124(1,2) (2019), pp. 1-333 (21)
      • Volume 124, Issue 1 (2019), pp. 1-85 (1)
      • Volume 124, Issue 2 (2019), pp. 86-1-333 (20)
    • Volume 125 (2019), pp. 1-259 (20)
    • Volume 126 (2019), pp. 1-298 (20)
    • Volume 127(1,2,3) (2019), pp. 1-376 (22)
      • Volume 127, Issue 1 (2019), pp. 1-55 (1)
      • Volume 127, Issue 2 (2019), pp. 56-105 (1)
      • Volume 127, Issue 3 (2019), pp. 106-376 (20)
    • Volume 128(1,2) (2019), pp. 1-432 (21)
      • Volume 128, Issue 1 (2019), pp. 1-70 (1)
      • Volume 128, Issue 2 (2019), pp. 71-432 (20)
    • Volume 129 (2019), pp. 1-267 (20)
    • Volume 130 (2019), pp. 1-308 (20)
    • Volume 131 (2019), pp. 1-288 (20)
    • Volume 132 (2019), pp. 1-312 (24)
    • Volume 133 (2019), pp. 1-274 (20)
    • Volume 134(1,2) (2020), pp. 1-338 (21)
      • Volume 134, Issue 1 (2019), pp. 1-51 (1)
      • Volume 134, Issue 2 (2019), pp. 52-338 (20)
    • Volume 135 (2019), pp. 1-298 (22)
    • Volume 136 (2019), pp. 1-246 (16)
    • Volume 137 (2019), pp. 1-236 (14)
    • Volume 138(1,2) (2019), pp. 1-294 (13)
      • Volume 138, Issue 1 (2019), pp. 1-64 (1)
      • Volume 138, Issue 2 (2019), pp. 65-294 (12)
  • 2020 (179)
    • Volume 139(1,2) (2020), pp. 1-258 (13)
      • Volume 139, Issue 1 (2020), pp. 1-60 (1)
      • Volume 139, Issue 2 (2020), pp. 61-258 (12)
    • Volume 140 (2020), pp. 1-184 (10)
    • Volume 141 (2020), pp. 1-155 (10)
    • Volume 142 (2020), pp. 1-194 (12)
    • Volume 143 (2020), pp. 1-261 (16)
    • Volume 144 (2020), pp. 1-449 (30)
    • Volume 145 (2020), pp. 1-408 (30)
    • Volume 146 (2020), pp. 1-289 (18)
    • Volume 147 (2020), pp. 1-208 (12)
    • Volume 148 (2020), pp. 1-121 (8)
    • Volume 149 (2020), pp. 1-165 (10)
    • Volume 150 (2020), pp. 1-181 (10)
  • 2021 (143)
    • Volume 151 (2021), pp. 1-122 (8)
    • Volume 152 (2021), pp. 1-125 (8)
    • Volume 153(1,2) (2021), pp. 1-215 (13)
      • Volume 153, Issue 1 (2021), pp. 1-42 (1)
      • Volume 153, Issue 2 (2021), pp. 43-215 (12)
    • Volume 154 (2021), pp. 1-174 (10)
    • Volume 155 (2021), pp. 1-154 (10)
    • Volume 156 (2021), pp. 1-191 (12)
    • Volume 157 (2021), pp. 1-188 (10)
    • Volume 158 (2021), pp. 1-298 (16)
    • Volume 159 (2021), pp. 1-223 (14)
    • Volume 160 (2021), pp. 1-337 (20)
    • Volume 161 (2021), pp. 1-156 (10)
    • Volume 162 (2021), pp. 1-178 (12)
  • 2022 (125)
    • Volume 163 (2022), pp. 1-157 (8)
    • Volume 164 (2022), pp. 1-149 (8)
    • Volume 165 (2022), pp. 1-209 (12)
    • Volume 166 (2022), pp. 1-145 (10)
    • Volume 167 (2022), pp. 1-161 (9)
    • Volume 168 (2022), pp. 1-146 (10)
    • Volume 169 (2022), pp. 1-201 (10)
    • Volume 170 (2022), pp. 1-171 (10)
    • Volume 171 (2022), pp. 1-125 (8)
    • Volume 172 (2022), pp. 1-333 (20)
    • Volume 173 (2022), pp. 1-161 (10)
    • Volume 174 (2022), pp. 1-176 (10)
  • 2023 (132)
    • Volume 175 (2023), pp. 1-108 (8)
    • Volume 176 (2023), pp. 1-174 (10)
    • Volume 177 (2023), pp. 1-136 (8)
    • Volume 178 (2023), pp. 1-165 (10)
    • Volume 179 (2023), pp. 1-164 (10)
    • Volume 180 (2023), pp. 1-162 (12)
    • Volume 181 (2023), pp. 1-215 (12)
    • Volume 182 (2023), pp. 1-265 (18)
    • Volume 183 (2023), pp. 1-226 (14)
    • Volume 184 (2023), pp. 1-154 (10)
    • Volume 185 (2023), pp. 1-191 (10)
    • Volume 186 (2023), pp. 1-160 (10)
  • 2024 (183)
    • Volume 187 (2024), pp. 1-156 (10)
    • Volume 188 (2024), pp. 1-197 (12)
    • Volume 189 (2024), pp. 1-310 (20)
    • Volume 190(1,2) (2024), pp. 1-351 (18)
      • Volume 190, Issue 1 (2024), pp. 1-69 (1)
      • Volume 190, Issue 2 (2024), pp. 70-351 (17)
    • Volume 191 (2024), pp. 1-207 (12)
    • Volume 192 (2024), pp. 1-319 (20)
    • Volume 193(1,2) (2024), pp. 1-252 (13)
      • Volume 193, Issue 1 (2024), pp. 1-45 (1)
      • Volume 193, Issue 2 (2024), pp. 46-252 (12)
    • Volume 194 (2024), pp. 1-213 (13)
    • Volume 195 (2024), pp. 1-235 (13)
    • Volume 196 (2024), pp. 1-221 (14)
    • Volume 197 (2024), pp. 1-231 (15)
    • Volume 198 (2024), pp. 1-402 (23)
  • 2025 (169)
    • Volume 199 (2025), pp. 1-253 (16)
    • Volume 200 (2025), pp. 1-223 (14)
    • Volume 201 (2025), pp. 1-245 (12)
    • Volume 202 (2025), pp. 1-317 (17)
    • Volume 203 (2025), pp. 1-438 (15)
    • Volume 204 (2025), pp. 1-353 (19)
    • Volume 205 (2025), pp. 1-272 (16)
    • Volume 206 (2025), pp. 1-172 (13)
    • Volume 207 (2025), pp. 1-173 (12)
    • Volume 208 (2025), pp. 1-174 (11)
    • Volume 209 (2025), pp. 1-184 (12)
    • Volume 210 (2025), pp. 1-158 (12)
  • 2026 (21)
    • Volume 211 (2026), pp. (21)
  • Info (6)
  • News (3)
  • Open access (460)
  • Premium (38)

Last Articles

  • All
  • Premium
  • Open access

Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of essential oils extracted from aromatic plants

2024-02-17

Quinoxaline-Thiazole Hybrid Derivatives: Synthesis, Characterization, Antimicrobial Activity, In-Silico Molecular Docking, and ADME Studies

2025-12-17

Applying Geophysical Method for Investigation of the Depth of the Mineralization Potential of Ikogosi and Environs Using Aeromagnetic Data

2024-01-04

Popular Articles

  • About Us

    About Us

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Submit your Article

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Jeevamrut – A Natural Fertilizer

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Abstracting & Indexing

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Guide for Authors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Careers

  • All
  • Careers
No Content Available
World Scientific News

World Scientific News (WSN) is an open-access fully peer-reviewed scholarly journal. The monthly – interdisciplinary journal is directed in the first place to scientists who want to publish their findings, insights, observations, conclusions, etc.

READ MORE

Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Guide for Authors
  • Instruction for Authors
  • Abstracting & Indexing
  • Submit your Article
  • Careers
  • News

Other databases

AGRO
CAS
Google Scholar
Google Scholar Metrics
ICZN
ProQuest
Road Directory
ZooBank

EISSN 2392-2192

Login / Register
Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy

made by fixfix

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Guide for Authors
    • Abstracting & Indexing
    • Instruction for Authors
    • Submit your Article
  • View Articles
    • 2026
    • 2025
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
  • Careers
  • News

made by fixfix

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.