World Scientific News
EISSN 2392-2192
  • Login
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Guide for Authors
    • Abstracting & Indexing
    • Instruction for Authors
    • Submit your Article
  • View Articles
    • 2026
    • 2025
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
  • Careers
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SUBMIT ARTICLE
Register
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Guide for Authors
    • Abstracting & Indexing
    • Instruction for Authors
    • Submit your Article
  • View Articles
    • 2026
    • 2025
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
  • Careers
  • News
No Result
View All Result
World Scientific News
No Result
View All Result
Home 2024

The Impact of Post-Spine Surgery Sandbag Pressure on Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage

Author: Hussein Imran Mousa, WSN 197 (2024) 122-131

2024-10-22
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0

ABSTRACT

One of the most well-known side effects of lumbar spine surgery is dural tears, which can be successfully treated using a variety of methods. Some of the procedures include primary repair, closed subarachnoid drainage, tissue grafting, fibrin-adhesive closure, and bed rest. A new strategy of preventing Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak is employed in this study, which includes post-operative sand bag pressure. Evaluation use sand bag to preventing postoperative CSF leak in lumbar spine surgeries. A prospective study 96 patients at the Hospital. Student t-test and Chi-squared or Fisher Exact’s tests used for CSF leak following various lumbar spine surgeries. Between March 2006 and March 2010, 52 patients were treated using standard treatments, and between March 2010 and March 2013, 44 patients with a post-operative CSF leak were treated with sand bag pressure. Patients in the traditionally treated group mean age 28.33, male to female ratio 11:2, (13.5 percent) ceased CSF leaks on the first day, but those in the post-operative sand bag pressure group mean age 31.32, male to female ratio 10.6:2, (68.2 percent) ceased CSF leaks on the first day. In terms of post-operative complications, the classically treated group had headache (55.7 percent), photophobia (25.0 percent), nausea (32.7 percent), vomiting (15.4 percent), meningitis (5.8 percent), and revision surgery (9.6 percent), whereas the post-operative sand bag pressure group had headache (20.5 percent), photophobia (9.1 percent), nausea (11.4 percent), vomiting (2.3 percent), meningitis (2.3 percent), and revision surgery (0 percent). Sand bag pressure is a great way to shorten the length and severity of a CSF leak.

References

 

  • Yi CT, Yi ST , Chang HO, Chun CL, Hao KW, Hung CK, Shih PH.Treatment, Outcome, and relapse of spontaneous and nonspontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak, Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 340.
  • Eismont, FJ, Wiesel SW, Rothman RH. Treatment of dural tears associated with spinal surgery. Bone and Joint Surg., 63-A: 1132-1136, Sept. 1981.63-A1132  1981.
  • Fang Z, Jia YT, Tian R. Subfascial drainage for management of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after posterior spine surgery—a prospective study based on Poiseuille’s law. Chin J Traumatol. 2016;    19:35–38.
  • Clarke MJ, Krauss WE. Cerebrospinal fluid happens. World Neurosurg 2015; 83:308-10.
  • Lin TY, Chen WJ, Hsieh MK, et al. Postoperative meningitis after spinal surgery: A review of 21 cases from 20,178 patients. BMC Infect Dis 2014;14:220.
  • Elder BD, Theodros D, Sankey EW, et al. Management of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage During Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Its Effect on Spinal Fusion. World Neurosurg 2016; 89:636-40.
  • Ghobrial GM, Theofanis T, Darden BV, et al. Unintended durotomy in lumbar degenerative spinal surgery: a 10-year systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 2015;39:E8.
  • Ulrich NH, Burgstaller JM, Brunner F, et al. The impact of incidental durotomy on the outcome of decompression surgery in degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis: Analysis of the Lumbar Spinal Outcome Study (LSOS) data-a Swiss prospective multi-center cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016;17:170.
  • Adogwa O, Huang MI, Thompson PM, et al. No difference in postoperative complications, pain, and functional outcomes up to 2 years after incidental durotomy in lumbar spinal fusion: A prospective, multi-institutional, propensity-matched analysis of 1,741 patients. Spine J 2014;14:1828-34.
  • Serkan E, Emre B, Fırat F. Treatment of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage by blood patch method in patients undergoing vertebra surgery, J Turk Spinal Surg. 2021:32(4):144-7
  • Weber C, Piek J, Gunawan D. Health care costs of incidental durotomies and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks after elective spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 2015; 24:2065-8.
  • Kasliwal MK, Tan LA, O’Toole JE. Intradural tumor recurrence after resection of extradural metastasis: a rare but potential complication of intraoperative durotomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2014;20:734-9.
  • Yanamadala V, Rozman PA, Kumar JI, et al. Vascularized Fibular Strut Autografts in Spinal Reconstruction after Resection of Vertebral Chordoma or Chondrosarcoma: A Retrospective Series. Neurosurgery 2017;81:156-64.
  • Tarantino R, Donnarumma P, Nigro L, et al. Surgery of intradural extramedullary tumors: Retrospective analysis of 107 cases. Neurosurgery 2014;75:509-14.
  • Yuyu Ishimoto, Mamoru Kawakami, Elizabeth Curtis, et al. The New Strategy for the Treatment of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak. Spine Surg Relat Res 2020: 95-98
  • Following Lumbar SurgeryTurel MK, D’Souza WP, Rajshekhar V. Hemilaminectomy approach for intradural extramedullary spinal tumors: an analysis of 164 patients. Neurosurg Focus 2015;39:E9.
  • Wong AP, Lall RR, Dahdaleh NS, et al. Comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for intradural-extramedullary spine tumors. Neurosurg Focus 2015;39: E11.
  • Formo M, Halvorsen CM, Dahlberg D, et al. Minimally invasive microsurgical resection of primary, intradural spinal tumors is feasible and safe: A consecutive series of 83 patients. Neurosurgery 2018; 82: 365-71.
  • Wong AP, Shih P, Smith TR, et al. Comparison of symptomatic cerebral spinal fluid leak between patients undergoing minimally invasive versus open lumbar foraminotomy, discectomy, or laminectomy. World Neurosurg 2014; 81: 634-40.

 


Download all article in PDF

WSN 197 (2024) 122-131

ADVERTISEMENT

 

Tags: CSF leakdural tearsmeningitis.Sandbagvertebral fracture
ShareTweetPin
Next Post

Crispy Squid Product Development (Case Study: PT. Cupa-Cupa Snack) Pangandaran Regency

Leveraging the Effectiveness of Interpretability in Malaria Cell Image Classification using Depthwise Inception Residual Model

View free articles

  • Open access

View Articles

  • 2013 (5)
    • Volume 1 (2013), pp. 1-14 (2)
    • Volume 2 (2013), pp. 1-29 (3)
  • 2014 (13)
    • Volume 3 (2014), pp. 1-21 (3)
    • Volume 4 (2014), pp. 1-16 (2)
    • Volume 5 (2014), pp. 1-36 (4)
    • Volume 6 (2014), pp. 1-23 (3)
  • 2015 (109)
    • Volume 10 (2015), pp. 1-100 (5)
    • Volume 11 (2015), pp. 1-96 (6)
    • Volume 12 (2015), pp. 1-76 (6)
    • Volume 13 (2015), pp. 1-130 (7)
    • Volume 14 (2015), pp. 1-55 (1)
    • Volume 15 (2015), pp. 1-25 (2)
    • Volume 16 (2015), pp. 1-158 (9)
    • Volume 17 (2015), pp. 1-63 (1)
    • Volume 18 (2015), pp. 1-127 (8)
    • Volume 19 (2015), pp. 1-111 (7)
    • Volume 20 (2015), pp. 1-336 (1)
    • Volume 21 (2015), pp. 1-89 (7)
    • Volume 22 (2015), pp. 1-119 (8)
    • Volume 23 (2015), pp. 1-127 (10)
    • Volume 24 (2015), pp. 1-87 (6)
    • Volume 7 (2015), pp. 1-237 (9)
    • Volume 8 (2015), pp. 1-203 (7)
    • Volume 9 (2015), pp. 1-160 (9)
  • 2016 (517)
    • Volume 25 (2016), pp. 1-16 (2)
    • Volume 26 (2016), pp. 1-19 (2)
    • Volume 27 (2016), pp. 1-16 (2)
    • Volume 28 (2016), pp. 1-100 (7)
    • Volume 29 (2016), pp. 1-95 (6)
    • Volume 30 (2016), pp. 1-142 (10)
    • Volume 31 (2016), pp. 1-124 (8)
    • Volume 32 (2016), pp. 1-81 (9)
    • Volume 33 (2016), pp. 1-121 (8)
    • Volume 34 (2016), pp. 1-145 (10)
    • Volume 35 (2016), pp. 1-133 (10)
    • Volume 36 (2016), pp. 1-152 (10)
    • Volume 37 (2016), pp. 1-303 (18)
    • Volume 38 (2016), pp. 1-59 (1)
    • Volume 39 (2016), pp. 1-30 (2)
    • Volume 40 (2016), pp. 1-299 (20)
    • Volume 41 (2016), pp. 1-287 (36)
    • Volume 42 (2016), pp. 1-316 (21)
    • Volume 43(1,2,3) (2016), pp. 1-157 (3)
      • Volume 43, Issue 1 (2016), pp. 1-55 (1)
      • Volume 43, Issue 2 (2016), pp. 56-103 (1)
      • Volume 43, Issue 3 (2016), pp. 104-157 (1)
    • Volume 44 (2016), pp. 1-301 (20)
    • Volume 45(1,2) (2016), pp. 1-383 (21)
      • Volume 45, Issue 1 (2016), pp. 1-62 (1)
      • Volume 45, Issue 2 (2016), pp. 63-383 (20)
    • Volume 46 (2016), pp. 1-286 (20)
    • Volume 47(1,2) (2016), pp. 1-350 (21)
      • Volume 47, Issue 1 (2016), pp. 1-61 (1)
      • Volume 47, Issue 2 (2016), pp. 62-350 (20)
    • Volume 48 (2016), pp. 1-163 (17)
    • Volume 49(1,2) (2016), pp. 1-404 (21)
      • Volume 49, Issue 1 (2016), pp. 1-58 (1)
      • Volume 49, Issue 2 (2016), pp. 59-404 (20)
    • Volume 50 (2016), pp. 1-316 (20)
    • Volume 51 (2016), pp. 1-71 (7)
    • Volume 52 (2016), pp. 1-275 (20)
    • Volume 53(1,2,3) (2016), pp. 1-429 (22)
      • Volume 53, Issue 1 (2016), pp. 1-66 (1)
      • Volume 53, Issue 2 (2016), pp. 67-109 (1)
      • Volume 53, Issue 3 (2016), pp. 110-429 (20)
    • Volume 54 (2016), pp. 1-299 (20)
    • Volume 55 (2016), pp. 1-288 (20)
    • Volume 56 (2015), pp. 1-266 (20)
    • Volume 57 (2016), pp. 1-570 (53)
    • Volume 58 (2016), pp. 1-161 (10)
    • Volume 59 (2016), pp. 1-128 (10)
    • Volume 60 (2016), pp. 1-120 (10)
  • 2017 (481)
    • Volume 61(1,2) (2017), pp. 1-194 (11)
      • Volume 61, Issue 1 (2017), pp. 1-51 (1)
      • Volume 61, Issue 2 (2017), pp. 52-194 (10)
    • Volume 62 (2017), pp. 1-146 (10)
    • Volume 63 (2017), pp. 1-240 (1)
    • Volume 64 (2017), pp. 1-140 (10)
    • Volume 65 (2017), pp. 1-175 (10)
    • Volume 66 (2017), pp. 1-300 (20)
    • Volume 67(1,2,) (2017), pp. 1-389 (21)
      • Volume 67, Issue 1 (2017), pp. 1-67 (1)
      • Volume 67, Issue 2 (2017), pp. 68-389 (20)
    • Volume 68 (2017), pp. 1-141 (1)
    • Volume 69 (2017), pp. 1-253 (20)
    • Volume 70(1,2) (2017), pp. 1-321 (21)
      • Volume 70, Issue 1 (2017), pp. 1-50 (1)
      • Volume 70, Issue 2 (2017), pp. 51-321 (20)
    • Volume 71 (2017), pp. 1-219 (18)
    • Volume 72 (2017), pp. 1-478 (46)
    • Volume 73 (2017), pp. 1-133 (15)
    • Volume 74 (2017), pp. 1-287 (20)
    • Volume 75 (2017), pp. 1-111 (12)
    • Volume 76 (2017), pp. 1-199 (20)
    • Volume 77(1,2) (2017), pp. 1-380 (21)
      • Volume 77, Issue 1 (2017), pp. 1-102 (1)
      • Volume 77, Issue 2 (2017), pp. 103-380 (20)
    • Volume 78 (2017), pp. 1-230 (24)
    • Volume 79 (2017), pp. 1-89 (1)
    • Volume 80 (2017), pp. 1-323 (20)
    • Volume 81(1,2) (2017), pp. 1-312 (21)
      • Volume 81, Issue 1 (2017), pp. 1-47 (1)
      • Volume 81, Issue 2 (2017), pp. 48-312 (20)
    • Volume 82 (2017), pp. 1-90 (1)
    • Volume 83 (2017), pp. 1-239 (20)
    • Volume 84 (2017), pp. 1-92 (1)
    • Volume 85 (2017), pp. 1-73 (10)
    • Volume 86(1,2,3) (2017), pp. 1-370 (22)
      • Volume 86, Issue 1 (2017), pp. 1-58 (1)
      • Volume 86, Issue 2 (2017), pp. 59-122 (1)
      • Volume 86, Issue 3 (2017), pp. 123-370 (20)
    • Volume 87 (2017), pp. 1-255 (20)
    • Volume 88(1,2) (2017), pp. 1-226 (11)
      • Volume 88, Issue 1 (2017), pp. 1-57 (1)
      • Volume 88, Issue 2 (2017), pp. 58-226 (10)
    • Volume 89 (2017), pp. 1-321 (33)
    • Volume 90 (2017), pp. 1-270 (20)
  • 2018 (486)
    • Volume 100 (2018), pp. 1-253 (20)
    • Volume 101 (2018), pp. 1-252 (20)
    • Volume 102 (2018), pp. 1-223 (20)
    • Volume 103 (2018), pp. 1-249 (18)
    • Volume 104 (2018), pp. 1-492 (40)
    • Volume 105 (2018), pp. 1-232 (20)
    • Volume 106 (2018), pp. 1-244 (20)
    • Volume 107 (2018), pp. 1-232 (20)
    • Volume 108 (2018), pp. 1-244 (20)
    • Volume 109 (2018), pp. 1-266 (19)
    • Volume 110 (2018), pp. 1-243 (20)
    • Volume 111 (2018), pp. 1-181 (17)
    • Volume 112 (2018), pp. 1-251 (20)
    • Volume 113 (2018), pp. 1-250 (26)
    • Volume 114 (2018), pp. 1-264 (20)
    • Volume 91 (2018), pp. 1-137 (10)
    • Volume 92(1,2) (2018), pp. 1-399 (21)
      • Volume 92, Issue 1 (2018), pp. 1-138 (1)
      • Volume 92, Issue 2 (2018), pp. 139-399 (20)
    • Volume 93 (2018), pp. 1-141 (15)
    • Volume 94(1,2) (2018), pp. 1-332 (21)
      • Volume 94, Issue 1 (2018), pp. 1-71 (1)
      • Volume 94, Issue 2 (2018), pp. 72-332 (20)
    • Volume 95 (2018), pp. 1-272 (20)
    • Volume 96 (2018), pp. 1-250 (20)
    • Volume 97 (2018), pp. 1-284 (20)
    • Volume 98 (2018), pp. 1-232 (20)
    • Volume 99 (2018), pp. 1-229 (19)
  • 2019 (467)
    • Volume 115 (2019), pp. 1-268 (20)
    • Volume 116 (2019), pp. 1-252 (19)
    • Volume 117 (2019), pp. 1-242 (20)
    • Volume 118 (2019), pp. 1-280 (20)
    • Volume 119 (2019), pp. 1-253 (20)
    • Volume 120(1,2) (2019), pp. 1-295 (21)
      • Volume 120, Issue 1 (2019), pp. 1-59 (1)
      • Volume 120, Issue 2 (2019), pp. 60-295 (20)
    • Volume 121 (2019), pp. 1-100 (13)
    • Volume 122 (2019), pp. 1-262 (20)
    • Volume 123 (2019), pp. 1-273 (20)
    • Volume 124(1,2) (2019), pp. 1-333 (21)
      • Volume 124, Issue 1 (2019), pp. 1-85 (1)
      • Volume 124, Issue 2 (2019), pp. 86-1-333 (20)
    • Volume 125 (2019), pp. 1-259 (20)
    • Volume 126 (2019), pp. 1-298 (20)
    • Volume 127(1,2,3) (2019), pp. 1-376 (22)
      • Volume 127, Issue 1 (2019), pp. 1-55 (1)
      • Volume 127, Issue 2 (2019), pp. 56-105 (1)
      • Volume 127, Issue 3 (2019), pp. 106-376 (20)
    • Volume 128(1,2) (2019), pp. 1-432 (21)
      • Volume 128, Issue 1 (2019), pp. 1-70 (1)
      • Volume 128, Issue 2 (2019), pp. 71-432 (20)
    • Volume 129 (2019), pp. 1-267 (20)
    • Volume 130 (2019), pp. 1-308 (20)
    • Volume 131 (2019), pp. 1-288 (20)
    • Volume 132 (2019), pp. 1-312 (24)
    • Volume 133 (2019), pp. 1-274 (20)
    • Volume 134(1,2) (2020), pp. 1-338 (21)
      • Volume 134, Issue 1 (2019), pp. 1-51 (1)
      • Volume 134, Issue 2 (2019), pp. 52-338 (20)
    • Volume 135 (2019), pp. 1-298 (22)
    • Volume 136 (2019), pp. 1-246 (16)
    • Volume 137 (2019), pp. 1-236 (14)
    • Volume 138(1,2) (2019), pp. 1-294 (13)
      • Volume 138, Issue 1 (2019), pp. 1-64 (1)
      • Volume 138, Issue 2 (2019), pp. 65-294 (12)
  • 2020 (179)
    • Volume 139(1,2) (2020), pp. 1-258 (13)
      • Volume 139, Issue 1 (2020), pp. 1-60 (1)
      • Volume 139, Issue 2 (2020), pp. 61-258 (12)
    • Volume 140 (2020), pp. 1-184 (10)
    • Volume 141 (2020), pp. 1-155 (10)
    • Volume 142 (2020), pp. 1-194 (12)
    • Volume 143 (2020), pp. 1-261 (16)
    • Volume 144 (2020), pp. 1-449 (30)
    • Volume 145 (2020), pp. 1-408 (30)
    • Volume 146 (2020), pp. 1-289 (18)
    • Volume 147 (2020), pp. 1-208 (12)
    • Volume 148 (2020), pp. 1-121 (8)
    • Volume 149 (2020), pp. 1-165 (10)
    • Volume 150 (2020), pp. 1-181 (10)
  • 2021 (143)
    • Volume 151 (2021), pp. 1-122 (8)
    • Volume 152 (2021), pp. 1-125 (8)
    • Volume 153(1,2) (2021), pp. 1-215 (13)
      • Volume 153, Issue 1 (2021), pp. 1-42 (1)
      • Volume 153, Issue 2 (2021), pp. 43-215 (12)
    • Volume 154 (2021), pp. 1-174 (10)
    • Volume 155 (2021), pp. 1-154 (10)
    • Volume 156 (2021), pp. 1-191 (12)
    • Volume 157 (2021), pp. 1-188 (10)
    • Volume 158 (2021), pp. 1-298 (16)
    • Volume 159 (2021), pp. 1-223 (14)
    • Volume 160 (2021), pp. 1-337 (20)
    • Volume 161 (2021), pp. 1-156 (10)
    • Volume 162 (2021), pp. 1-178 (12)
  • 2022 (125)
    • Volume 163 (2022), pp. 1-157 (8)
    • Volume 164 (2022), pp. 1-149 (8)
    • Volume 165 (2022), pp. 1-209 (12)
    • Volume 166 (2022), pp. 1-145 (10)
    • Volume 167 (2022), pp. 1-161 (9)
    • Volume 168 (2022), pp. 1-146 (10)
    • Volume 169 (2022), pp. 1-201 (10)
    • Volume 170 (2022), pp. 1-171 (10)
    • Volume 171 (2022), pp. 1-125 (8)
    • Volume 172 (2022), pp. 1-333 (20)
    • Volume 173 (2022), pp. 1-161 (10)
    • Volume 174 (2022), pp. 1-176 (10)
  • 2023 (132)
    • Volume 175 (2023), pp. 1-108 (8)
    • Volume 176 (2023), pp. 1-174 (10)
    • Volume 177 (2023), pp. 1-136 (8)
    • Volume 178 (2023), pp. 1-165 (10)
    • Volume 179 (2023), pp. 1-164 (10)
    • Volume 180 (2023), pp. 1-162 (12)
    • Volume 181 (2023), pp. 1-215 (12)
    • Volume 182 (2023), pp. 1-265 (18)
    • Volume 183 (2023), pp. 1-226 (14)
    • Volume 184 (2023), pp. 1-154 (10)
    • Volume 185 (2023), pp. 1-191 (10)
    • Volume 186 (2023), pp. 1-160 (10)
  • 2024 (183)
    • Volume 187 (2024), pp. 1-156 (10)
    • Volume 188 (2024), pp. 1-197 (12)
    • Volume 189 (2024), pp. 1-310 (20)
    • Volume 190(1,2) (2024), pp. 1-351 (18)
      • Volume 190, Issue 1 (2024), pp. 1-69 (1)
      • Volume 190, Issue 2 (2024), pp. 70-351 (17)
    • Volume 191 (2024), pp. 1-207 (12)
    • Volume 192 (2024), pp. 1-319 (20)
    • Volume 193(1,2) (2024), pp. 1-252 (13)
      • Volume 193, Issue 1 (2024), pp. 1-45 (1)
      • Volume 193, Issue 2 (2024), pp. 46-252 (12)
    • Volume 194 (2024), pp. 1-213 (13)
    • Volume 195 (2024), pp. 1-235 (13)
    • Volume 196 (2024), pp. 1-221 (14)
    • Volume 197 (2024), pp. 1-231 (15)
    • Volume 198 (2024), pp. 1-402 (23)
  • 2025 (169)
    • Volume 199 (2025), pp. 1-253 (16)
    • Volume 200 (2025), pp. 1-223 (14)
    • Volume 201 (2025), pp. 1-245 (12)
    • Volume 202 (2025), pp. 1-317 (17)
    • Volume 203 (2025), pp. 1-438 (15)
    • Volume 204 (2025), pp. 1-353 (19)
    • Volume 205 (2025), pp. 1-272 (16)
    • Volume 206 (2025), pp. 1-172 (13)
    • Volume 207 (2025), pp. 1-173 (12)
    • Volume 208 (2025), pp. 1-174 (11)
    • Volume 209 (2025), pp. 1-184 (12)
    • Volume 210 (2025), pp. 1-158 (12)
  • 2026 (21)
    • Volume 211 (2026), pp. (21)
  • Info (6)
  • News (3)
  • Open access (460)
  • Premium (38)

Last Articles

  • All
  • Premium
  • Open access

A Strategic Environmental Assessment for Southern Coastal of West Java Province, Indonesia

2024-01-30

Design, Testing, and Analysis of STATCOM and TCSC for Real-Time Simulation

2024-01-26

Solving Hexagonal Intuitionistic Fuzzy Fractional Transportation Problem Using Ranking and Russell’s Method

2024-01-30

Popular Articles

  • About Us

    About Us

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Submit your Article

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Jeevamrut – A Natural Fertilizer

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Abstracting & Indexing

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Guide for Authors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Careers

  • All
  • Careers
No Content Available
World Scientific News

World Scientific News (WSN) is an open-access fully peer-reviewed scholarly journal. The monthly – interdisciplinary journal is directed in the first place to scientists who want to publish their findings, insights, observations, conclusions, etc.

READ MORE

Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Guide for Authors
  • Instruction for Authors
  • Abstracting & Indexing
  • Submit your Article
  • Careers
  • News

Other databases

AGRO
CAS
Google Scholar
Google Scholar Metrics
ICZN
ProQuest
Road Directory
ZooBank

EISSN 2392-2192

Login / Register
Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy

made by fixfix

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Guide for Authors
    • Abstracting & Indexing
    • Instruction for Authors
    • Submit your Article
  • View Articles
    • 2026
    • 2025
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
  • Careers
  • News

made by fixfix

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.