ABSTRACT
The components of the disturbing function R as a function of eccentricity and mean anomaly are considered. The first component of the perturbation function R1, which is expanded by eccentricity to a fixed power, was studied. A numerical analysis was carried out for the quantities of the absolute difference and relative deviation for R1 at the selected powers in the expressions by eccentricity. Results were obtained depending on different values of eccentricity and mean anomaly. Expansions of the disturbing function by eccentricity to the seventh and twentieth powers were basic.
References
- A. Rahoma, Orbital Elements Evolution Due to a Perturbing Body in an Inclined Elliptical Orbit. J. Astron. Space Sci. 31(3) (2014) 199-204
- C. Domingos, R.V. de Moraes, and A.F.B.A. Prado, Third-Body Perturbation in the Case of Elliptic Orbits for the Disturbing Body. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2008 (2008) 763654
- H. Jo, I.K. Park, N. Choe, M. Choi, The Comparison of the Classical Keplerian Orbit Elements, Non-Singular Orbital Elements (Equinoctial Elements), and the Cartesian State Variables in Lagrange Planetary Equations with J2 Perturbation: Part I. J. Astron. Space Sci. 28 (2011) 37-54
- Martinusi, L. Dell’Elce, G. Kerschen, Analytic propagation of near-circular satellite orbits in the atmosphere of an oblate planet. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 123 (2015) 85-103
- A. Abdel-Aziz, An analytical theory for avoidance collision between space debris and operating satellites in LEO. Applied Mathematical Modelling 37(18–19) (2013) 8283-8291
- M. Alessi, G.Schettino, A. Rossi, G.B. Valsecchi, Solar radiation pressure resonances in Low Earth Orbits. MNRAS 473 (2018) 2407
- Haranas, S. Pagiatakis, Satellite motion in a non-singular gravitational potential. Astrophys. Space Sci. 327 (2010) 83-89
- Celletti, I. De Blasi, C. Efthymiopoulos, Nekhoroshev estimates for the orbital stability of Earth’s satellites. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 135 (2023) 10.
- P. Aksenov. Theory of the motion of artificial Earth satellites. Nauka, Moscow, 1977, 360 p.
- A. Chebotarev. Analytical and numerical methods of celestial mechanics, Nauka, Moscow, 1965, 368 p.
- N. Duboshin. Celestial mechanics: methods of the theory of motion of artificial celestial bodies, Nauka, Moscow, 1983, 352 p.
- Cayley, Tables of the Developments of Functions in the Theory of Elliptic Motion. Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society (Mem. Roy. Astron. Soc.) 29 (1859) 191-306.
- F. Subbotin. Introduction to Theoretical Astronomy, Moscow, Naukа, 1968, 800 p.
- P. Jarnagin, Expansions in elliptical motion, Astron. Pap. Am. Ephem. Naut. Alm. 18 (1965) 1-659
- F. Proskurin and Yu. V. Batrakov, Perturbations in the motion of artificial satellites due to the oblateness of the earth. Bull. Inst. Theor. Astro. 7 (1960) 537-548
- A. Chebotarev, Motion of an Artificial Satellite in an Orbit of Small Eccentricity. AIAA Journal, Vol. 2(1) (1964) 203-208
- V. Aleksandrov. Celestial mechanics, Kharkiv: KhNU named after V.N. Karazin, 2006, 256 p.
- N. Duboshin. Reference Manual on Celestial Mechanics and Astrodynamics, Nauka, Moscow, 1976, 864 p.
- Brouwer G.M. Clemence. Methods of celestial mechanics. Academic Press, New York and London, 1961, 598 p.
- Broucke, How to assemble a Keplerian processor. Celestial Mechanics 2 (1970) 9-20
Download all article in PDF
ADVERTISEMENT
