Personal Ventilation Modeling Using a CFD Analysis

ABSTRACT

The growing trend for energy savings has resulted in tightening the building envelope, so the risk of contaminant accumulation and cross contamination is growing. Often, traditional mechanical ventilation systems that are installed in airtight buildings are not efficient in providing the proper amount of fresh air for individuals and do not protect them from cross contamination. Personal ventilation is an alternative to traditional ventilation systems as it provides fresh and purified air directly to the breathing zone. Not only does this method, in many cases, improve the thermal comfort of occupants, but also protects them from cross contamination from other occupants. In this study an air terminal device was tested to see if it would protect the occupant from cross contamination under changing conditions of the flow rate. Different velocities were simulated using the AnsysFluent CFD program, thanks to which the velocity around the occupants face was shown. The chosen velocities were 15 L/s, 10 L/s, 5L/s and 1L/s. The results showed that when the air flow was low, the personal ventilation system may not be effective in protecting against cross contamination.

References

1. L. Pérez-Lombard, J. Ortiz, and C. Pout, A review on buildings energy consumption information, Energy Build., 40(3) (2008) 394-398.

2. S. Baden, P. Fairey, P. Waide, and J. Laustsen, Hurdling Financial Barriers to Low Energy Buildings : Experiences from the USA and Europe on Financial Incentives and Monetizing Building Energy Savings in Private Investment Decisions, Proc. 2006 ACEEE Summer Study Energy Effic. Build., 2006 pp. 1-16.

3. Directive 2010/31/EU, Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings. 2010, pp. 13-35.

4. P. Torcellini, S. Pless, and M. Deru, Zero Energy Buildings: A Critical Look at the Definition Preprint, ACEE Summer study, 2 (2006) 15.

5. N. E. Klepeis, W. C. Nelson, W. R. Ott, J. P. Robinson, a M. Tsang, P. Switzer, J. V Behar, S. C. Hern, and W. H. Engelmann, “The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants.,” J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 11(3) (2001) 231-252.

6. D. P. Wyon, The effects of indoor air quality on performance and productivity, Indoor Air, 14(7) (2004) 92-101.

7. U. Satish, M. J. Mendell, K. Shekhar, T. Hotchi, D. Sullivan, S. Streufert, and W. J. Fisk, Is CO2 an indoor pollutant? direct effects of low-to-moderate CO2 concentrations on human decision-making performance, Environ. Health Perspect., 120(12) (2012) 1671-1677.

8. P. Strom-Tejsen, D. Zukowska, P. Wargocki, and D. P. Wyon, The effects of bedroom air quality on sleep and next-day performance, Indoor Air, 26(5) (2016) 679-686.

9. J. S. Park and C. H. Yoon, The effects of outdoor air supply rate on work performance during 8-h work period, Indoor Air, 21(4) (2011) 284-290.

10. A. K. Melikov, Personalized ventilation, Indoor Air, 17(s7) (2004) 157-167.

11. M. Taheri, M. Schuss, A. Fail, and A. Mahdavi, A performance assessment of an office space with displacement, personal, and natural ventilation systems, Build. Simul., 9(1) (2016) 89-100.

12. A. Lipczynska, J. Kaczmarczyk, and A. K. Melikov, Thermal environment and air quality in office with personalized ventilation combined with chilled ceiling, Build. Environ., 92 (2015) 603-614.

13. Z. Bolashikov, Airflow characteristics in the breathing zone of a seated person using desk incorporated pair of confluent jets as personalized ventilation – Effect of supply velocities, 10th Int. Conf. Heal. Build. 2 (2012) 1514-1519.

14. A. Bogdan, B. Koelblen, and M. Chludzińska, Influence of a breathing process on the perception of the thermal environment using personalised ventilation, Build. Environ., 96 (2016) 80-90.

15. M. Dalewski, A. K. Melikov, and M. Vesely, Performance of ductless personalized ventilation in conjunction with displacement ventilation: Physical environment and human response, Build. Environ., 81 (2014) 354-364.

16. A. K. Melikov, M. A. Skwarczynski, J. Kaczmarczyk, and J. Zabecky, Use of personalized ventilation for improving health, comfort, and performance at high room temperature and humidity, Indoor Air, 23(3) (2013) 250-263.

17. J. Kaczmarczyk, a. Melikov, Z. Bolashikov, L. Nikolaev, and P. O. Fanger, Human Response to Five Designs of Personalized Ventilation, HVAC & R Res., 12(2) (2006) 36-384.

18. ANSYS, ANSYS FLUENT Theory Guide. Inc. Release 14.0, (http://www.ansys.com), 2011.

19. A. Makhoul, K. Ghali, and N. Ghaddar, Thermal comfort and energy performance of a low-mixing ceiling-mounted personalized ventilator system, Build. Environ., 60 (2013) 126-136.

20. T. Liu, Z. Liu, G. Li, and Z. Zuo, Comparative Study of Numerical Simulation of Indoor Thermal Environment in the Pattern of Personalized Ventilation and Stratum Ventilation, Procedia Eng., 121 (2015) 785-791.

21. J. M. Villafruela, I. Olmedo, M. Ruiz de Adana, C. Méndez, and P. V. Nielsen, CFD analysis of the human exhalation flow using different boundary conditions and ventilation strategies, Build. Environ. 62 (2013) 191-200.

22. M. Ning, S. Mengjie, C. Mingyin, P. Dongmei, and D. Shiming, Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling of air flow field, mean age of air and CO2 distributions inside a bedroom with different heights of conditioned air supply outlet, Appl. Energy, 164 (2016) 906-915.

23. N. Szczepanik and J. Schnotale, CFD Simulations and Measurements of Carbon Dioxide Transport in a Passive House, in ICR2015: The 24th IIR International Congress of Refrigeration: Improving Quality of Life, Preserving the Earth, 2015.



Download all article in PDF

WSN 57 (2016) 298-307