ABSTRACT
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into medical education offers substantial benefits but also presents critical challenges. As AI technologies become more embedded in healthcare, medical students face pitfalls such as over-reliance on AI tools, limited understanding of their limitations, and insufficient training in ethics and data quality. Many students feel unprepared to critically evaluate AI-generated recommendations, raising concerns about the erosion of clinical reasoning and decision-making skills. This dependence may result in future physicians who struggle to apply core medical principles independently. Furthermore, the lack of formal AI education leaves students unable to fully grasp ethical issues, including algorithmic bias and the opacity of “black box” decision-making. Although students recognize AI’s potential to enhance clinical outcomes, they also express concern about inadequate preparation for navigating its ethical complexities. This disconnect highlights the need for structured training that addresses both technical competencies and ethical considerations. Experts stress the importance of integrating AI education into medical curricula, emphasizing not only how AI systems function but also how to critically appraise their outputs and ensure patient-centered care. A balanced curriculum should foster critical thinking, ethical awareness, and real-world application. By equipping students with these skills, educational institutions can prepare future healthcare professionals to use AI as a supportive tool without compromising their clinical judgment or ethical responsibilities. In doing so, the medical field can embrace AI innovation while safeguarding the integrity of patient care and upholding professional standards.
References
- [1] Armstrong BK, Kricker A. The epidemiology of UV-induced skin cancer. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2001;84447.
- [2] Cadet J, Douki T. Formation of UV-induced DNA lesions: cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 6–4 photoproducts. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2018; 12:1816–35.
- [3] Mouret S, Baudouin C, Charveron M, Favier A, Cadet J, Douki T. Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers predominate in human skin exposed to UVA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 37:13765.
- [4] Fan F. Mechanism of ultraviolet radiation-induced basal cell carcinoma. Ann Transl Med. 2023; 11:55995.
- [5] Mouret S. Cooperation between base and nucleotide excision repair on UV lesions. Genet Mol Biol (São Paulo). 2006;29.
- [6] Paulo MS, Symanzik C, Ádam B. Risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma due to occupational solar ultraviolet exposure: protocol. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0282664.
- [7] Gobba F, Modenese A, John SM. Skin cancer in outdoor workers exposed to solar radiation in Italy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019; 33:2068.
- [8] Ling G, Persson A. Persistent p53 mutations in single cells from normal skin. Am J Pathol. 2001;159:1247.
- [9] Glass AG, Hoover RN. The rising epidemic of melanoma and non‑melanoma skin cancers. Photochem Photobiol. 1989;38:569–75.
- Bajdik CD, Gallagher RP, Astrakianakis G. Non‑solar UV radiation and risk of basal and squamous cell cancer. Br J Cancer. 1996; 73:1612–4.
- de Winter S. Solar‑simulated UV exposure and epidermal DNA damage. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;117:867–74.
- Cadet J, Anselmino C, Douki T, Voituriez L. Photochemistry of nucleic acids in cells: UV‑induced DNA damage. Photochem Photobiol Sci.
- Beani JC. Ultraviolet A‑induced DNA damage: role in skin cancer. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2014; 198:273 95.
- Anderson MW, Hewitt JP, Spruce SR. Broad spectrum physical sunscreens: TiO₂ and ZnO. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed.
- Protić‑Sabljić M, Tuteja N, Munson PJ, Dixon K. UV light‑induced pyrimidine dimers mutagenic in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
- Ley RD. Photoreactivation of UV‑induced pyrimidine dimers in opossum skin. 1985.
Download all article in PDF
